Ben Smallbone’s “Homestead” is a film set in a world where a nuclear bomb is detonated off the coast of Los Angeles by foreigners. The main characters are saved due to their ownership of a Tesla, Bitcoin being the primary valuable currency, and truth can only be found on Right-Wing radio. While this premise may appeal to some viewers, it raises red flags for many others.
Although “Homestead” may seem like it resides on the outskirts of mainstream media, similar films are not uncommon. Movies like “Black Hawk Down” and “300” have portrayed non-white antagonists in a negative light, serving as targets for heroic white protagonists. “Forrest Gump” also shines a light on societal divides and differing beliefs among characters. Despite these common themes, “Homestead” stands out for its exploration of moral conflicts and ethical dilemmas derived from the works of Jeff Kirkham and Jason Ross.
The story revolves around Ian and Jenna Ross, a wealthy couple living in a fortified estate called Homestead. As chaos ensues following a nuclear attack, the Ross family becomes a beacon of hope for desperate refugees seeking shelter. The film delves into themes of pragmatism versus idealism, generosity towards others, and the consequences of selfish nationalism.
While “Homestead” boasts a capable cast and skilled direction, it falters in its ending, shifting the focus to setting up a potential TV series rather than providing a satisfying conclusion for the standalone film. The film’s message advocating for charity takes a questionable turn as it encourages viewers to support the filmmakers financially, blurring the lines between philanthropy and self-promotion.
Despite its technical merits, “Homestead” leaves a sour taste with its questionable business practices and unfulfilled promises. While it may resonate with a specific audience, the film’s ethical dilemmas and conflicting messages ultimately detract from its overall impact.
Source link
